McCain Latest to Lean to Legalized Sports Betting ; Adelson’s Crusade Against Online Gambling Fueled By RAWA

John McCain welcomes discussion on legalized sports betting
By David Purdum |
Another prominent voice is calling for a national conversation on expanding legalized sports betting outside of Nevada.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), speaking on “Capital Games” with ESPN’s Andy Katz and ABC’s Rick Klein, said Congress needs to hold hearings to discuss legalizing sports betting.

“We need a debate in Congress,” McCain said. “We need to have a talk with the American people, and we need to probably have hearings in Congress on the whole issue so we can build consensus.”

The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 prohibits state-sponsored sports betting in all but four states. Nevada is the only state that allows single-game sports wagering. Delaware, Montana and Oregon have limited forms of sports betting.

When asked why Nevada should be allowed to offer sports betting, but no other state, McCain replied, “I think you’ve got an excellent point, and that’s why it’s an excellent issue.”

McCain acknowledged that huge amounts of money are being gambled on sporting events, especially football. According to revenue numbers released Friday by Nevada Gaming Control, $3.9 billion was wagered on sports in 2014 at the state’s sports books. But gaming experts believe that’s only a small fraction of the amount that’s bet illegally on sports in the U.S. The American Gaming Association estimates $138.9 billion was wagered illegally on sports in 2013. Some estimates have gone as high as $400 billion.

Estimated money placed on illegal sports bets dwarfs that of legal bets, according to the American Gaming Association.

“I think that there [are] places for sports gambling in states, where gambling is legal,” McCain said. “We obviously know that there are huge amounts gambled on sporting events, particularly football.”

McCain’s comments come nearly three months after NBA commissioner Adam Silver penned an op-ed in the New York Times in which he called for Congress to consider creating a federal framework to closely monitor sports betting and allow states to authorize betting on professional sports.

“I believe that sports betting should be brought out of the underground and into the sunlight where it can be appropriately monitored and regulated,” Silver concluded.

New Jersey has been fighting to bring Las Vegas-style sports betting to its racetracks and casinos for three years. The NCAA, NFL, NBA, NHL and Major League Baseball have sued and successfully stopped New Jersey’s efforts to this point. That case is headed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in the spring.
David Purdum
Joined ESPN in 2014
Journalist covering gambling industry since 2008



Rep. Jason Chaffetz Re-Introduces RAWA in Congress
By Dan Katz
The Three Stooges are back. The Sheldon Adelson-backed Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) bill has been reintroduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R – Utah), the same person who introduced it in 2014. Senator Lindsey Graham (R – S.C.) introduced a twin bill in the Senate last year, and while he has yet to do so in 2015, it would not be at all surprising if he did. Online gambling has clearly been on his mind recently, as evidenced by his questioning of Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch on the subject in late January.

RAWA is the continuation of Las Vegas Sands Corp. CEO Sheldon Adelson’s crusade against online gambling. He has vowed to do “whatever it takes” to end the industry in the United States and seems determined to control as many politicians as he can to force his will on the American people. The name of the bill is actually quite misleading, as it would not “restore” the Interstate Wire Act to 1961 to any sort of previous state, but rather change it to codify a prior incorrect interpretation of the law. The Wire Act clearly states that sports betting over wire communications is prohibited, not other types of gambling (nobody really argues that “wire communication” shouldn’t include the internet, even though there was no internet in 1961). Here is the relevant text of the Act (emphasis added):

Whoever being engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly uses a wire communication facility for the transmission in interstate or foreign commerce of bets or wagers or information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers on any sporting event or contest, or for the transmission of a wire communication which entitles the recipient to receive money or credit as a result of bets or wagers, or for information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

When internet gambling started gaining steam in the late 1990’s and into the 2000’s, the Department of Justice, for whatever reason, interpreted the Wire Act to include all online gambling. Around Christmas 2011, though the DoJ clarified its stance on the Wire Act, saying that it only applied to sports betting over the internet, not other forms of gambling like poker. That prompted some states to begin the process of legalizing and regulating intrastate online gambling and to date, Nevada, Delaware, and New Jersey have online gambling industries.

Adelson hates online gambling, seeing it (incorrectly) as a threat to his gigantic land-based gaming business, so that DoJ clarification really grinded his gears. That’s where RAWA comes in. He wants the old interpretation of the Wire Act to be put back in place by actually changing the Wire Act to reflect his desires. RAWA would amend the Wire Act to change the reference to sports betting to all betting, change mentioned of “bets or wagers” to “any bets or wagers,” and to make sure it is clear that wire communication includes the internet.

If the RAWA were to ever become law, the online gambling regimes in Nevada, Delaware, and New Jersey would all become illegal, as would online lottery ticket sales, which are currently legal in a few states. There are carveouts for online horse racing gambling and online fantasy sports.

In a press release, John Pappas, Executive Director of the Poker Players Alliance, came out strongly against Adelson, Chaffetz, and RAWA, saying, “Every Congress to consider internet gaming legislation has preserved the right of states to protect its citizens through a system that is accountable to regulators and the government. Attempting to re-write history through a piece of legislation that prohibits states from enacting these safeguards represents the worst kind of crony capitalism that favors a mega political campaign donor over what’s in the best interest of the states and their consumers.”

Despite outrageous claims made by opponents of state regulated internet gaming, it has not led to the downfall of Western society,” he added. “In fact, to date there has not been a single documented case of a minor playing on any of these state regulated sites and no report of people wagering on a regulated website that is not authorized in their state. Finally, claims that regulated internet gaming is a conduit for money laundering and terrorist financing are completely false and have no backing in the real world. At best these claims are fear-mongering, at worst they are outright deception.”

Want the latest poker news in your twitter feed? Follow PokerNewsDaily on Twitter.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.