BeatleShow; Buying a Zoo


By Chuck Rounds
Get all the entertainment information you need at Chuck’s great site www/

BeatleShow! (formerly, The Fab Four Live;) is playing inside the Saxe Theater in the Miracle Mile Shops at Planet Hollywood. It moved from the V Theater not too long ago, and for this show, it is a good move. This is a tribute show (obviously, to the Beatles—their sound, their look, their music, and most of all, their legacy. The recreation of John, Paul, George, and Ringo is done well, and I appreciate that the emphasis of the recreation was with the music. The sound of the band is far more important than the look. You do get the feel of what it might have been like to be at a Beatles concert. It is emphasized on several occasions that this music is being played and sung live-another element that I really appreciate.

The show is broken down into three distinct parts: the early Beatles music of the 60’s, the Sgt. Pepper era, and their later and more mature music that cemented their place in musical history. Each of the sections includes elements that help to frame them in their historical and cultural context.

I really appreciated the attention to detail that these musicians took in recreating the look and feel of each of the Beatles—the high hold that John used on his guitar, the left-handed bass playing of Paul, and the matchstick grip that Ringo used in his drum playing. Additionally, the sound that these four musicians produce is so good that it did, in fact, sound as if they could be lip-syncing the performance. It wasn’t until the solo performances that you could better hear the separation.

While each of the sections was musically done well, the transitions from one section to another still need work. We all know that the musicians need a break, and they need to do their costume changes, and the transition from one era of music to another is not an easy task…right now it looks as if they are doing the best they can until something better comes along. The introduction of Austin Powers for the last section of music really didn’t work for me.

The first part of the show was, of course, hosted by Ed Sullivan. The Sullivan did a great job at setting the stage and introducing the Beatles. The section had all of the best known early hits: I Want to Hold Your Hand, Hard Days Night, Twist and Shout, etc.

The second part used the Sgt. Pepper album for their music and their colorfully costumed look. Additional videos helped frame the feel of the “Beatlemania” that swept, not only this country, but internationally—hearing “commoners” sing Yellow Submarine was priceless.

The last part brought out all of the more meaningful long-lasting hits that solidified the Beatles legacy. The message of Peace and Love is just as meaningful and relevant today as it ever was.

Every Beatles show that I have ever seen has gone through the career of the group in a chronological order, but it is the early music that is the most up-beat and fun. The later music (while certainly more mature,) is colored with the turmoil of the time. Just once I would like to see a show that brings back the joy of the early music to the end of the show. I want to leave the theatre with that spring in my step…just a thought…

I enjoyed this tribute show. The musicians did a great job. I am a Beatles fan as well, so I was certainly both predisposed to liking the material, as well as being ready to be protective and critical of any missteps to the music with which I grew up. I am not sure how a non-Beatles fan would take to the show. Ah, kids today… Would they enjoy the music as much as me? I wish that I had brought my daughter to see what she thought…for the fan, however, it was a great tribute of the Beatles greatest hits.

I would recommend the show to anyone who has ever been a fan of the Beatles.


(2011) (Matt Damon, Scarlett Johansson) (PG)

Review courtesy of

If you want to see more reviews like this, here is where to go:  It’s a great place to check out the latest in films

Drama: Hoping to keep his family together, a widower moves his kids out to a zoo property and then tries to get that place ready for the new season.
Benjamin Mee (MATT DAMON) is a reporter who worries about his kids following the death of their mother six months ago. Moody teenager Dylan (COLIN FORD) retreats into his macabre sketches when not acting up in school, and while his younger sister, Rosie (MAGGIE ELIZABETH JONES), has yet to show any signs of misbehaving, Benjamin is concerned that won’t last. Accordingly, and after Dylan is expelled, Benjamin decides they all need a fresh start.
So he quits his job and buys a house to which a former small zoo is attached. Now run by the state, the place is set to be closed down soon, much to the relief of Benjamin’s brother, Duncan (THOMAS HADEN CHURCH), who thinks the whole idea is harebrained at best. Undeterred by any of that, Benjamin decides he can reopen the place and thus sets out to make sure the small staff has everything they need.

That includes Kelly Foster (SCARLETT JOHANSSON), the head zookeeper who initially isn’t sure the family knows what they’re getting themselves into, a belief shared by other workers including Robin (PATRICK FUGIT), Rhonda (CARLA GALLO) and Peter (ANGUS MACFADYEN). Kelly’s niece Lily (ELLE FANNING), however, is happy to see Dylan, although the feeling isn’t initially mutual. And Peter is never happy to see Walter Ferris (JOHN MICHAEL HIGGINS), the state inspector who occasionally makes surprise visits.

As Benjamin realizes running such a place involves a lot more work and cash than he imagined, he tries to get it ready for its grand reopening, all while hoping to bring his family closer together once again.

OUR TAKE: 6 out of 10
Like most people, I really enjoy going to zoos. After all, they’re a tremendous and affordable shortcut to seeing many of the world’s various species of animals, all in one place, without the need to spend thousands of dollars and many months or even years jet-setting around to try to get a glimpse of them in their natural habitat.
We’re fortunate here in the nation’s capital to have a stellar zoological park, aptly named The National Zoo, but I actually prefer one that’s more than an hour out of town. And that’s the Catoctin Wildlife Preserve and Zoo in Thurmont, MD. It’s nice because it’s a smaller and more intimate place where you can get far closer to the animals than in bigger zoos. And it’s been family run since 1966, something that gives the place a bit more of a homey feel that I like.

Thus, I was hoping I was going to love “We Bought a Zoo,” the latest drama from director Cameron Crowe that’s loosely based on a true story about — yes, you guessed it — a family that buys a zoo. The real story — detailed in the book “We Bought a Zoo: The Amazing True Story of a Young Family, a Broken Down Zoo, and the 200 Wild Animals That Change Their Lives Forever” — involved Englishmen Benjamin Mee moving his family to the Dartmoor Wildlife Park in Devonshire (following his father’s death) and trying to rehabilitate the place, all while his wife was dying from cancer.

Here, writer/director Crowe (“Jerry Maguire,” “Almost Famous”) and fellow scribe Aline Brosh McKenna have moved the story to Southern California after the wife/mother’s death. With that occurring before our story begins, the protagonist (a likeable Matt Damon) feels like he’s losing control of his teenage son (Colin Ford, doing the typical sullen adolescent thing) and doesn’t want that to rub off on the boy’s younger sister (a cute Maggie Elizabeth Jones, although the portrayal occasionally borders on rote precociousness).

Accordingly, he buys a remote property to which a real zoo is attached — something that would seem like a made-up concoction if not for the real life inspiration — and then finds it’s a lot more work than he imagined, what with dealing with the staff, the animals, the regulations and a grand reopening date. Along the way, natch, the family heals itself and cynical critics cringe at that convention.

While I obviously knew that was coming – and how could I or anyone for that matter not see it from miles away, or at least the beginning of the flick — it didn’t bother me too much. That said, like any zoo that’s varied in its presentation and attractions you like and others that might bore you, the film comes off the same way. In fact, it’s rare to find a flick like this where it’s all over the place in terms of tone as well as scenes that work quite well and others that aren’t as successful.

Yes, I get that some of the animal scenes as well as whacky characterizations and performances are designed as slight or even full-on comic relief to offset the more serious elements (including that of father-son strife, the aftereffects of the loss of the mother, an ailing tiger that most everyone thinks needs to be euthanized, etc.).

But Crowe and company probably could have done a better job of melding or at least segueing between such disparate material. As it stands, it’s occasionally fairly jarring making such tonal moves, while some scenes are just plain strange, such as when a grizzly escapes from the zoo and twice encounters Damon’s character (and is menacing, but undercut by a lighthearted score).

That said, I liked the flick more often than not, especially when it hits the right notes about dealing with loss. Damon feels comfortable in the role, and Scarlett Johansson has stepped down her va-va-voom sex appeal many notches to play the unattached lead zookeeper (yes, you also pretty much know where that set-up is headed). Angus Macfadyen and Thomas Haden Church are around for more comic relief, while former Crowe star Patrick Fugit (from “Almost Famous”) and rising star Elle Fanning appear in smaller parts.

This is pretty much instantly forgettable stuff once you’ll be away from it for a while. But like a real zoo experience, it has enough charms and winning moments to make it enjoyable enough during the actual visit. “We Bought a Zoo” rates as a 6 out of 10.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.