Internet Poker Bill Victim of Stall
Why Has Co-Sponsorship on Joe Barton’s Internet Poker Bill Stalled?
by Matthew Kredell – pokernews.com
Joe Barton told PokerNews last month that he thought his bill to license and regulate Internet poker had the votes to pass on the House floor. According to the Congressman from Texas, it’s just a matter of getting the legislation up for a vote, which he hopes will happen next summer.
This was an encouraging and exciting declaration for poker players hoping to get back to playing online poker in a safe and secure environment. But the proclamation raises one question: If support for the bill is that strong, why does it only have 25 co-sponsors?
There are 435 voting members in the House of Representatives, so 218 votes are needed to pass a bill. Twenty-five co-sponsors plus Barton is about 12 percent of the way there.
The Internet Gambling Prohibition, Poker Consumer Protection, and Strengthening UIGEA Act of 2011, also known as HR 2366, was introduced by Barton in late June with a head start of 11 original co-sponsors. It reached its current total of 25 by mid-August, meaning it hasn’t picked up any added support over the last four months.
During that time, online poker was discussed twice in the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade, of which Barton is a member. However, no one else has put their name on his bill.
In comparison, Barney Frank’s Internet gambling licensing and regulation bill hit 70 co-sponsors last year, yet no one thought it had anywhere close to the votes to pass on the House floor.
“As an organization, we haven’t really pushed much for co-sponsorship since the summer,” said John Pappas, executive director of the Poker Players Alliance, which brought the idea of introducing the bill to Barton. “Rep. Barton would rather add a Republican and add a Democrat rather than add five-to-six Democrats at a time.”
Even though the bill was introduced by a Republican, the 25 co-sponsors break down to 19 Democrats and six Republicans.
“I think there are a lot of Republicans who will ultimately vote for the bill but are less inclined to put their names on as a co-sponsor unless pressed to vote on it,” Pappas said.
Certainly, the bill doesn’t need a lot of co-sponsors as long as it has influential people working behind the scenes to get it to a vote. The purpose of co-sponsors is to show House leadership that a bill needs to be addressed.
It’s fair that online poker is an issue that many representatives wouldn’t take up as a cause to actively support, yet would vote for when called upon — particularly a bill that is framed as one that, while allowing poker, strengthens restrictions against other forms of online gambling.
While poker players want to believe in Barton’s declaration, it’s best to remain cautious in expectations until the bill proves to have the momentum that he predicts.
“We may want to restore a push for co-sponsors in the beginning of the new year,” Pappas said.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Barton Reiterates Need to Pass Online Poker Bill This Term
By Charles – pokernewsreport.com
Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX), the sponsor of a proposed bill aimed at legalizing online poker, was a keynote speaker at the two-day Digital Gaming and Lottery Policy Summit held in the nation’s capital this week and again espoused the need to pass online poker legislation during the current Congressional term.
“One of the caveats that I asked the stakeholders before I created the bill was I want to get it done in this Congress, which means this year or next year,” Barton said. “The bottom line is we want to get to it as quickly as possible. The poker bill has a chance in this Congress.”
The Congressman addressed an assembly of gambling operators, policymakers, regulators and technology providers gathered together to discuss impending policy changes in the U.S. that may result in regulations of internet poker and gambling. Barton talked about the different ways that a poker bill could eventually become legislation.
“My best guess is that if we move our bill out of the Energy Commerce Committee there would be some sort of discussion between the Speaker of the House John Boehner and Majority Leader Reid in which they’ll try to reach an agreement on a vehicle over in the Senate,” Barton said.
“I’m not doing something for the Congress after, so my operating premise is that sometime in this Congress, we will attempt to move the bill out of the Energy and Commerce Committee,” Barton added. “We will attempt to move it to the floor of the House of Representatives, and we will attempt to get a bill out of the Senate or get a vehicle we can marry in a conference committee.”
Barton told the summit attendees that getting a bill passed through Congress is more times than not a very difficult process. He said it’s very likely that “if the House moves first, the Senate almost never moves at all, so we don’t want to move a bill through the House and have it just sit over there in the Senate, especially since for some of our members in the House, this is not a vote they would prefer to take.”
Barton also spoke about the possibility that a bill could be attached as a rider to another measure as was done with the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act in 2006, which rode through on the tails of the SAFE Port Act. The super committee considered it last month, but poker legislation was never included in the final product. Barton also hinted about the outside shot of an attachment in the near future for passage, but implied that it is not a likely scenario.
Barton appears focused mostly on the bill meandering through the typical passage route out of the House of Representatives. “I think we have the votes in the House to get it through. If we get it to a vote on the floor of the House, I think it will pass,” said Barton. “A lot of this is politics and in this case it’s not Republican and Democrat politics. It’s more House and Senate politics. Is this something the leadership of both houses wants to spend time on in an election year? It is such a sensitive subject and there is some controversy about whether you should allow any type of internet gaming to go on at all.”
Barton readily acknowledges being a winning poker player most of the time, and dutifully sharing his winnings with his wife. Industry observers have wondered aloud as to how many Congressmen actually play poker, either online or in live poker games. In a light-hearted comment, Barton insisted that many Congressmen are poker players, though few will admit to it. “They just don’t play as well as I do,” he said.
